| Free Newsletter |
Get the best articles sent to your inbox!
|
| Featured Products |
|
Any Brander Now you can brand resell rights products...even if you don't have branding rights!
Download Protector A fully automated download system developed for clickbank.com merchants.
Marketing Videos Over four hours of exclusive Internet marketing coaching videos.
Niche Profit Formula Easily create niche products, each running on auto-pilot, making money daily!
Splash Screen Generator Instantly add amazing Splash Screens to your website.
|
|
Scroll Box Buddy |
|
|
|
CAN CHINA'S DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY BE APPLIED TO ALL THICKLY POPULATED NATIONS ?
Author: Dr.VSR.Subramaniam
Website: http://ww.drvsrs.com
Added: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:04:52 -0500
Category: Politics
Views: 112
Printable Version |
Send To Friends |
Bookmark |
Reprint
Historically, the first documented era of China starts with the Shang Dynasty in 1600 to 1027 BC, in the yellow river valley. The Peoples Republic of China was established by Mao Tse-Tung (Mao Zedong) on 1st October 1949 AD, with reforms on Land, Social, Thought and the Economic planning. Subsequent to the cultural revolution in April 1966 AD, China with the top population in the world, remained as a Communist country, specifically closing its channels of communications to the world. But China as a thickly populated country had a tough responsibility to provide the basic needs and employment to the domestic population, as wells as to upgrade its techno-commercial infrastructure (Endogenous responsibility). Also as a country behind the great wall, had a commitment to improve and escalate the domestic investments from the internal sources, without much dependence on any external assistance (Exogenous responsibility).
But the unilateral state controlled corporate sectors inducted an inadequacy to its Endogenous responsibility.
Closure for the doors to the techno-commercial development taking place outside the great wall, blocked the opportunity to upgrade the path of its Exogenous responsibility.
This was advantageously understood and accepted by all nations, after the wall-breaking merger of the communist East Germany with the capitalist West Germany in October 1990, and the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic on 31st December 1991 (USSR - A powerful communist union of Eastern European and North Asian countries, established in 1922).
China has opened its doors to adopt and moderate the latest technology to suit the local conditions, from the outer non-communist world (by skipping a generation of technology), in the communication as well as manufacturing, service and all other sectors, with a prime emphasis on the domestic manpower utility. China also opened its channel to private domestic investments, and has been admitted as a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) from 11th December 2001. Now, anywhere in the world, the toughest and fearful under-cutting competitor to any common man's product, particularly in garments, electrical & electronic item, is China !!!. Even the sales quantum of similar items, from top class manufacturers in Europe or USA are drastically reduced due to the presence of "Made in China" products, distracting the customer through the price leverage. Cost-conscious production with domestic manpower, moderated latest technology and domestic capital is a good guideline for all tickly populated nations.
(You may please refer to my published research concept at http://www.drvsrs.com/sedfull.htm and slide show at http://www.drvsrs.com/sedslides.htm , on the need for such an approach for an “accelerated development” orientation).
However, the quality and performance aspects of the cheaply available Chinese products are debatable !!
It is because of the fact that changes in China is at varying speeds, did not synchronise the techno commercial development with optimum and timely Management Decision methodology.
China considers quantum output and flooding the international markets with cheap products as a tool for progress, than a dynamic Socio-Economic Development oriented long term Productivity approach. This approach is wrong. Because of this, China do not appear in the Hi-technology and Engineering product market, where quality and precision counts.
(You may please refer to my published research concept at http://www.drvsrs.com/mgmtfull.htm and slide show at http://www.drvsrs.com/mgmtslide.htm for a redefined Productivity approach and attuning the management decision).
the great wall, blocked the opportunity to upgrade the path of its Exogenous responsibility.
About the Author:
Consultant in Socio-economic development, ISO 9001:2000 and Management Information Systems. Contributing author to Ideas & Research Papers in Economics, Social Science Network. Expert in Economics at Allexpers
Over 45 years of experience with multi-nationals, Commonwelath, Caribbean Development Bnak etc...
Reprint This Article
|
|